Rupert Murdoch cancels Davos visit to negotiate over Sky buyout

Murdoch's News Corporation has offered 'undertakings' of independence for Sky News which the culture secretary is considering

Rupert Murdoch today chose to cancel his visit to the Davos global economic summit in order to personally lead negotiations with the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, in an effort to get News Corporation's 8bn buyout of Sky approved by offering guarantees to safeguard Sky News's independence.

Murdoch's decision also gives him time to review the News of the World phone-hacking cases on a day when Sky showed it could be ruthless with its employees by sacking the pundit Andy Gray following "unacceptable and offensive behaviour" after a second set of clips emerged showing the presenter making sexist comments to a colleague before going on air.

In the morning Hunt said he considered that News Corporation's buyout of the 61% of BSkyB it did not already own might "operate against the public interest in media plurality"; for that reason he intended to refer the matter to the Competition Commission.

However, in a surprise move, the culture secretary said he would consider an undertaking from News Corp that the company "could sufficiently alleviate the concerns" he had, allowing him to accept its undertakings rather than make a reference to the commission.

It is understood that News Corp's undertakings concern an offering of editorial guarantees on the independence of Sky News, although the former refuses to contemplate a sale of the 24-hour channel. The move sets the stage for several weeks of direct negotiation between Hunt, who will be advised by the Office of Fair Trading, and News Corporation at a time when Murdoch is in London. However, with Murdoch's News of the World mired in the phone-hacking controversy, expectations are growing that the media owner could try to resolve the issue so that it does not obstruct the merger approval.

Hunt's team said that their decision was motivated by a desire to be seen to be fair to all parties, and! avoid a legal challenge by News Corp or the alliance of newspapers, including the Guardian, that has opposed the bid.

However, critics argued that it made it easier for Hunt to reach an agreement with Murdoch. Claiming that Hunt should simply heed the advice of Ofcom, Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture, media and sport secretary, said: "The right thing to do is to refer the bid to the Competition Commission instead [he] has chosen an unprecedented course of action, which raises further doubts about the integrity of the process."

Ofcom has concluded that a combination, with Sky, of News Corporation's newspapers, the Sun and Times, would give the company a 22% share of news consumption in the UK. That would put it second only to the BBC, which accounts for 37%, and well in excess of the 10% held by ITN, which supplies news to ITV and Channel 4.

News Corp hit back at Ofcom's analysis, saying, in a 216-page rebuttal, that it believed Ofcom had failed to consider the Murdoch bid "with an open mind".

The company also said it believed the entire regulatory process was "seriously flawed" because the decision to refer the bid to Ofcom was made by Vince Cable, the business secretary, who was stripped of his role in overseeing it when he told Telegraph journalists before Christmas that he had "declared war on Murdoch".

News Corp, it emerged, had also demanded that Ofcom release all the correspondence it had had with Cable and his department, in what was widely seen as an evidence-gathering exercise ahead of any judicial review should the company fail to get what it wanted.

Ofcom published the letters, although regulatory sources insisted they "showed nothing interesting". An Ofcom spokesman hit back at News Corp, saying the regulator stood by its report, "a rigorous, thorough and independent assessment of the issues". The spokesman added: "News Corporation's response makes assertions of purported errors by Ofcom in its report. Ofcom entirely rejects this analysis and we refer to our repo! rt for a clear, accurate and independent assessment of the public interest issues."

News Corp, however, said it had won on two points. Ofcom concluded, insiders said, that media plurality amounted only to the choice and provision of news; and the regulator set aside worries about whether News Corp newspapers could enjoy an unfair advantage if they were "bundled" in with a Sky subscription, whether in print or online.

The regulator also admitted that it was unable to consider how News Corp and the fast-growing Sky would behave in the future, saying that there was "no mechanism" for the regulator to consider what might occur in the future.

In a joint statement, BT and the companies behind the Guardian, Daily Mail, Daily Mirror and Daily Telegraph said it was a matter of regret that the secretary of state had "not followed the advice of the independent regulator". The group added: "The process outlined today is unprecedented. We are particularly concerned that parties other than News Corporation will not have the opportunity to put forward their case until after the secretary of state has come to a decision on proposed remedies."


guardian.co.uk Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Te! rms & ; Conditions | More Feeds



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Britons in Egypt: Foreign Office planning 'for all eventualities'

James Blunt gets mother's backing in 'posh pop' row

NHS applauded for boost in quality of hospital care