Prison counselling charity under inquiry following unfair dismissal
Robina Husain-Naviatti lost her job at Forensic Therapies after raising questions about 300,000 of missing funds
A charity providing counselling services at UK prisons is to be investigated by the Charity Commission over allegations of financial impropriety and possible embezzlement involving public funds after a whistle-blower won her case for unfair dismissal.
Robina Husain-Naviatti, the former deputy director of Forensic Therapies, which has provided "offence-focused" counselling and psychotherapy to inmates at HMP Brixton, Pentonville, Holloway and Wandsworth, was awarded 47,580 in compensation after being unfairly dismissed when she raised concerns over 300,000 of "missing funds" from the Cabinet Office.
In 2008, she alerted her boss and trustees that a 535,000 Cabinet Office grant for a project at Holloway, which she was managing, had been recorded as only 240,000 in a business plan.
When Husain-Naviatti confronted the charity's director, Steve Morris about the "missing funds" he said he couldn't remember how much funding the cabinet Offfice had pledged, which she found implausible given that it was the largest amount of funding Forensic Therapies had received and he had spoken about it regularly.
She also raised concerns that the Cabinet Office and another charity had unwittingly both paid for her 35,000 salary, suggesting that it may have been duplicated and "siphoned off or otherwise misapplied", an employment tribinal heard.
When, frustrated at a lack of response, Husain-Naviatti raised her concerns officially in a grievence procedure, she was suspended and then sacked six months later.
A judgment, at Watford employment tribunal, found that she was unfairly dismissed. It accepted that her disclosures about financial impropriety were made in good faith and recommended that the Charity Commission fully investigate her claims.
Following the judgment, Husain-Naviatti, a trained psychotherapist and mediator, said: "All I'd ever wanted was! the tru th. I had sincerely held suspicions of financial impropriety and I wanted it to be investigated properly. The way I was treated because of that was a shock to me. I was victimised, harrassed and ultimately lost my livelihood for daring to raise serious concerns."
Her solicitor, Shah Qureshi, said that whistleblowers were a "vital check against complacency and cover-ups", recognised by the law. He said: "This judgment sends out a signal to charities that they are in a position of trust and must act with propriety at all times, otherwise public confidence can be damaged.'
"My client suffered horrendously for raising her concerns in good faith. Questions remain regarding the use of these funds and it is incumbent upon the Charity Commission as recommended by the employment tribunal that a full and thorough investigaion is carried out."
A Charity Commission spokesperson said: "We are aware of the recent employment tribunal of a former employee of Forensic Therapies Ltd (registered charity no. 1114599) and are currently considering concerns that have been raised with us about the charity."
"Concerns have previously been raised with the Commission about the charity and we are now looking again at this matter."
No-one from Forensic Therapies could be contacted by the Guardian today.
The charity's trustees put it into liquidation before the case began.
Comments